Monday, October 26, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETMON, OCT 26 editionNext edition in Next in --:--:--
Intelligence Verdict
Compare AI models

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Qwen3.8-27B

DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Alibaba (Qwen)'s Qwen3.8-27B, side by side: what each costs, how much it can read at once, whether you can run it yourself, and where independent tests place it.

  • —no price to compare
  • 1Mcontext window, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
  • 0–0higher placings on boards ranking both
In short

How they differ.

Worked out from the figures below. Prices and specs are the makers' own, read Oct 20, 2026.

  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 reads more at once: a context window of 1M tokens against 262K.
  • Both can be downloaded and run on your own machine.
  • No independent board we follow ranks both models yet.
Side by side

The specs.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen3.8-27B
Made byDeepSeek · ChinaAlibaba (Qwen) · China
ReleasedOct 17, 2026Aug 5, 2026
Price per 1M tokens$0.30 in / $1.20 out (peak-hours price)Free to download; hosts set prices
Context window1M262K
Takes intext, imagetext, image, video
Download and run it yourselfYes (MIT)Yes (Apache 2.0)
Size552B backbone parameters parameters, 8B per token during prefill, 16B during decode active27B (dense) parameters
Maker says“Stronger benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs than the previous version.”“a native vision-language model that understands images and videos, with flexible thinking control”
SourcesPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · DescriptionPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · Description
Independent tests

Where they place.

Position on each board we follow (1 is best). Epoch AI's and Vectara's scores are shown; the other boards are linked for their own figures.

BoardDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen3.8-27B
Vals IndexVals AI, Oct 19, 2026#8Not listed
Terminal-Bench 4.0Vals AI, Oct 19, 2026#17Not listed
Vibe Code BenchVals AI, Oct 18, 2026#11Not listed