Monday, October 26, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETMON, OCT 26 editionNext edition in Next in --:--:--
Intelligence Verdict
Compare AI models

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral AI's Mistral Medium 3.5, side by side: what each costs, how much it can read at once, whether you can run it yourself, and where independent tests place it.

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Litecheaper per output token
  • 1Mcontext window, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  • 0–0higher placings on boards ranking both
In short

How they differ.

Worked out from the figures below. Prices and specs are the makers' own, read Oct 20, 2026.

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper per output token: $2.50 against $7.50 per million tokens, so Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 3 times as much.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite reads more at once: a context window of 1M tokens against 256K.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 can be downloaded and run on your own machine; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can't.
  • No independent board we follow ranks both models yet.
Side by side

The specs.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMistral Medium 3.5
Made byGoogle · USMistral AI · France
ReleasedJul 21, 2026Apr 28, 2026
Price per 1M tokens$0.30 in / $2.50 out$1.50 in / $7.50 out
Context window1M256K
Takes intext, image, video, audio, pdftext, image
Download and run it yourselfNoYes (Modified MIT)
SizeNot published128B (dense) parameters
Maker says“Our fastest, most cost-effective 3.5 model for high-throughput execution.”“Our frontier-class multimodal model optimized for agentic and coding use cases.”
SourcesPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · DescriptionPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · Description
Independent tests

Where they place.

None of the boards we follow lists either model yet.