Monday, October 26, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETMON, OCT 26 editionNext edition in Next in --:--:--
Intelligence Verdict
Compare AI models

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Muse Glimmer

DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Meta's Muse Glimmer, side by side: what each costs, how much it can read at once, whether you can run it yourself, and where independent tests place it.

  • —no price to compare
  • 1Mcontext window, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
  • 0–0higher placings on boards ranking both
In short

How they differ.

Worked out from the figures below. Prices and specs are the makers' own, read Oct 20, 2026.

  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 reads more at once: a context window of 1M tokens against 131K.
  • Both can be downloaded and run on your own machine.
  • No independent board we follow ranks both models yet.
Side by side

The specs.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Glimmer
Made byDeepSeek · ChinaMeta · US
ReleasedOct 17, 2026Aug 2026
Price per 1M tokens$0.30 in / $1.20 out (peak-hours price)Free to download; hosts set prices
Context window1M131K
Takes intext, imagetext, image
Download and run it yourselfYes (MIT)Yes (Apache 2.0)
Size552B backbone parameters parameters, 8B per token during prefill, 16B during decode active~29.6B (dense; repo header says 30B) parameters
Maker says“Stronger benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs than the previous version.”“Built to enable always-on, local agents, available on Hugging Face.”
SourcesPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · DescriptionPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · Description
Independent tests

Where they place.

Position on each board we follow (1 is best). Epoch AI's and Vectara's scores are shown; the other boards are linked for their own figures.

BoardDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Glimmer
Vals IndexVals AI, Oct 19, 2026#8Not listed
Terminal-Bench 4.0Vals AI, Oct 19, 2026#17Not listed
Vibe Code BenchVals AI, Oct 18, 2026#11Not listed