Monday, October 26, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETMON, OCT 26 editionNext edition in Next in --:--:--
Intelligence Verdict
Compare AI models

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer

Google's Gemma 4 31B and Meta's Muse Glimmer, side by side: what each costs, how much it can read at once, whether you can run it yourself, and where independent tests place it.

  • —no price to compare
  • 256Kcontext window, Gemma 4 31B
  • 0–0higher placings on boards ranking both
In short

How they differ.

Worked out from the figures below. Prices and specs are the makers' own, read Oct 20, 2026.

  • Gemma 4 31B reads more at once: a context window of 256K tokens against 131K.
  • Both can be downloaded and run on your own machine.
  • No independent board we follow ranks both models yet.
Side by side

The specs.

Gemma 4 31BMuse Glimmer
Made byGoogle · USMeta · US
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Aug 2026
Price per 1M tokensFree to download; hosts set pricesFree to download; hosts set prices
Context window256K131K
Takes intext, image, videotext, image
Download and run it yourselfYes (Apache 2.0)Yes (Apache 2.0)
Size30.7B (dense) parameters~29.6B (dense; repo header says 30B) parameters
Maker says“Today, we are introducing Gemma 4 — our most intelligent open models to date.”“Built to enable always-on, local agents, available on Hugging Face.”
SourcesPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · DescriptionPrices, Oct 20, 2026 · Description
Independent tests

Where they place.

None of the boards we follow lists either model yet.