Experts' recommendations due under Newsom's frontier-AI executive order
Recommendations, including a possible emergency-shutoff duty, are due within two months of the 2026-09-18 order (exact day not confirmed).
California, Colorado, Illinois, Texas, Utah and New York, where most binding US AI law is being written.
Recommendations, including a possible emergency-shutoff duty, are due within two months of the 2026-09-18 order (exact day not confirmed).
Notice, explanation and record-keeping duties begin; the attorney general must issue rules by this date.
Employers using AI for hiring and other employment decisions must give pre-use notices, offer opt-outs and do risk assessments.
Five-year ban on selling toys for under-16s that include a companion chatbot.
Human review required before AI-driven firing or discipline; new child-safety duties for companion chatbots.
Audit requirements of Adam's Law start.
Laws, orders, regulator rules, court rulings and deadlines. Filter by kind.
Employers may not fire or discipline based solely on an automated decision system (effective 2027-07-01); SB 951 adds AI-layoff notices; AB 1883 bars emotion-recognition and neural-data surveillance; AB 1979 keeps AI advisory in health care. AB 2656 and AB 2575 were vetoed.
“Nobody wants to be fired by a machine.”
KQED, Oct 1, 2026
Speeds implementation of SB 813 and AB 1405 (AI evaluator and auditor laws) and convenes experts to recommend further safeguards, such as an emergency shutoff duty for frontier developers, within two months.
“the stakes are too high to wait or delay action”
Spectrum News 1, Sep 18, 2026
SB 1119 adds child risk assessments, independent child-safety audits and age verification to the companion-chatbot law (effective 2027-07-01); SB 867 bans toys with companion chatbots from 2027 to 2031.
Tech Policy Press, Sep 2026
Narrower 'automated decision-making technology' law: developer disclosures to deployers, notice to consumers, plain-language explanation within 30 days of an adverse decision, no private right of action. Takes effect 2027-01-01.
Taft (law firm bulletin), May 27, 2026
xAI challenged SB 24-205 as unconstitutional; the Justice Department moved to intervene on equal-protection grounds, and a federal magistrate judge stayed enforcement on 2026-04-27 with the state's agreement.
“Laws that require AI companies to infect their products with woke DEI ideology are illegal.”
U.S. Department of Justice press release, Apr 24, 2026
Effective date of Public Act 103-0804.
LegiScan, IL HB3773 (2023), Aug 9, 2024
Effective date of HB 149.
LegiScan, TX HB149 (2025), Jun 22, 2025
Large frontier AI developers must publish safety protocols and report critical-harm incidents within 72 hours; a new office in the Department of Financial Services oversees them; penalties up to $1m (first) and $3m (later) violations.
“New York now has the strongest AI transparency law in the country.”
Governor Kathy Hochul press release, Dec 19, 2025
SB 243 sets rules for companion chatbots (self-harm protocols, AI disclosure, break reminders for minors); AB 316 bars the defense that 'the AI did it'; AB 853 amends the AI Transparency Act; AB 621 raises deepfake-porn penalties.
“Our children's safety is not for sale.”
Office of Governor Gavin Newsom, Oct 13, 2025
Large frontier AI developers must publish a safety framework, report critical safety incidents to the state Office of Emergency Services, and protect whistleblowers; also sets up CalCompute.
“AI is the new frontier in innovation.”
Office of Governor Gavin Newsom, Sep 29, 2025
Special-session law pushing the start date of SB 24-205's requirements from 2026-02-01 to 2026-06-30.
“The act extends the effective date of the requirements of Senate Bill 24-205 to June 30, 2026.”
Colorado General Assembly, SB25B-004, Aug 28, 2025
Bars using AI to provide therapy or make mental-health treatment decisions; clinicians may still use AI for support tasks. (Press release of Monday 2025-08-04 says it was signed 'on Friday'.)
“prohibits anyone from using AI to provide mental health and therapeutic decision-making”
Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Aug 4, 2025
Texas law regulating the use of AI systems in the state, with civil penalties; effective 2026-01-01.
“Relating to regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in this state; providing civil penalties.”
LegiScan, TX HB149 (2025), Jun 22, 2025
Amends the Illinois Human Rights Act so employers may not use AI that discriminates against protected classes (or zip codes as a proxy) and must tell workers when AI is used. Effective 2026-01-01.
LegiScan, IL HB3773 (2023), Aug 9, 2024
First broad US state law on 'high-risk' AI: duty of reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination, impact assessments and consumer notices. Originally due 2026-02-01; later delayed, then replaced before taking effect.
Epstein Becker Green, Workforce Bulletin, May 20, 2024
Created an Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and a 'learning laboratory', and requires disclosure when generative AI is used to interact with consumers (if asked, or up front in regulated occupations); fines up to $2,500 per violation. Took effect 2024-05-01.
“This bill takes effect on May 1, 2024.”
Utah Legislature, S.B. 149 (2024) enrolled bill, Mar 13, 2024
Read at each source on Oct 19, 2026. All places